CONTACT US
LOGIN
HOME
Resources for Lawyers
Admissions to the Bar
Member Assistance Program
Lawyer Assistance Program
About Lawyer Assistance
How Lawyer Assistance Works
Lawyer Assistance Referral Form
Information for New Bar Admittees
Guidelines for IOLTA
Lawyer Inactive Status
Pattern Jury Instructions
Ethic Opinions
Legislation
Printable Forms
Protect Your Practice Toolkit
Career Center
State/Local Bar Associations
Barnes County Bar Association
Big Muddy Bar Association
Cass County Bar Association
Greater Grand Forks County Bar
Lake Region Bar Association
North Dakota Association for Justice
North Dakota Defense Lawyers Association
Upper Missouri Bar Association
Ward County Bar Association
Walsh County Bar Association
ND Century Code
ND Supreme Court
US Supreme Court Opinions
CI/GAL Roster
CI/GAL Information
Continuing Legal Education
SBAND Seminars
SBAND Seminar Materials
SBAND CLE Self Study Catalog
ND Commission Approved CLE's
CLE Reporting Periods
CLE Hours
CLE Guidelines
CLE Policies
Forms
Webinars
IVN Info
MN Approval
Other Seminars
Refund Policies
About the Bar
Board of Governors
SBAND Staff
Committees
Committee Members
Section Members
Member Directory
Member Services
ND Bar Foundation
ByLaws/Constitution
ND Professionalism & Civility
News & Events
News
Gavel
News Archive
Calendar of Events
Classified Advertising
Media Press Kit
Other Legal News Services
Resources for the Public
To File A Complaint
Criminal Court Procedure in North Dakota
Graduating Into An Adult World Booklet
Lawyer Referral Service
Legal Services of North Dakota
Legal Resources
ND Dept of Human Services
Volunteer Lawyers
ND Supreme Court
Lawyers Directory
Parenting Time Fact Sheet
Public Services
CI/GAL Roster
CI/GAL Information
Bar Foundation
2006 - Assisting Jurors at Impasse
C-85.75
Closing Instructions
Jury
This instruction is offered to help your deliberations, not to force you to reach a verdict. You may wish to identify areas of agreement and areas of disagreement. You may then wish to discuss the law and the evidence as they relate to areas of disagreement. If you still have disagreement, you may wish to identify for the Court and counsel which issues or questions of law or fact you would like counsel or the Court to assist you with. If you elect this option, please list in writing the issues where further assistance might help bring about a verdict. I do not wish or intend to force a verdict. We are merely trying to be responsive to your apparent need for help. If it is reasonably probable that you could reach a verdict as a result of this procedure, it would be wise to give it a try. In light of the foregoing, I shall ask you to retire to deliberate further and make a conscientious effort to reach a verdict.
Benzmiller v. Swanson, 117 NW2d 281 (ND 1962)
Borstad v. LaRoque, 98 NW2d 16 (ND 1959)
Lathrop v. Fargo Moorhead St. Ry. Co., 136 NW 88 (
State v. Champagne, 198 NW2d 218, 238 (ND 1972)
State v. Shafer-Imhoff, 2001 ND 146, 632 NW2d 825
Notes:
This instruction should not be given as part of the original series, but only if, after reasonable deliberation, the Jury reports an inability to agree or fails to return a verdict. In addition, it should be noted that providing assistance under Rule 6.9 is completely within the court’s discretion, both in the decision to provide the assistance and the manner in which assistance is provided. If giving this instruction, the following procedure should be observed: 1) Before the trial judge attempts to ascertain whether the Jury is deadlocked, both counsel should be present along with the reporter. At that time, the Court, on the record, should state the facts concerning any communication from the Jury, or if there has been no communication, the length of time the Jury has been deliberating, and inform counsel that the Court proposes to give the instruction, giving counsel an opportunity to object, if they so desire. 2) In the presence of both counsel and the reporter, the Jury should be returned to the box, and the Court, after cautioning them not to reveal the numerical division in the voting or which side has the preponderance, should ask the Jury Leader if they are unable to reach a verdict. If the Jury is at an impasse, the Court may give this instruction and return them to the jury room to deliberate further.
Upcoming Events
2013 Upcoming CLE Schedule (PDF)
SBAND Annual Meeting
Indigent Defense CLE
Quick Links
CaseMaker
Pattern Jury Instructions
Ethics Opinions
Gavel
SBAND CLE Seminars
ND Commission Approved CLE's
Find Law
Search