• 2006 - Notice to State or Political Subdivision(Roadways, Streets, and Sidewalks)
  • C-16.05
    • Highways And Roadways
    • Public Entities
    • Streets And Sidewalks
    • Tort Liability
    • Tort Liability
  • Before [the State] [a political subdivision] may be found at fault, the Plaintiff must prove that the [State] [political subdivision] knew or should have known of the defective and unsafe condition of the [roadway] [sidewalk] [street] in question. The notice can be either express or constructive.

     

    Express Notice

     

    Express notice is notice actually communicated to the [State] [political subdivision] through its duly constituted officials.

     

    Constructive Notice

     

    Constructive notice is notice that the [State] [political subdivision] is deemed to have from the circumstances of the case. [The State] [A political subdivision] has constructive notice of such defective and unsafe condition of its [roadway] [sidewalks] [street] as it would have discovered by the exercise of ordinary care and diligence. The [State] [political subdivision] must maintain an active vigilance over its roadways, streets, and sidewalks to see that they are kept in a reasonably safe condition for public travel. The circumstances of each case determine whether the [State] [political subdivision] had constructive notice.

     

    Whether the [State] [political subdivision] in this case had express or constructive notice of the alleged defective and unsafe condition of the [roadway] [sidewalk] [street] is a question of fact for you to decide in determining the issue of the fault of the [State] [political subdivision].

    * * * * *

    • 12.1-14-02
    • Dahl v. Nelson, 56 NW2d 757, 759-60 (ND 1953)
    • Maloney v. City of Grand Forks, 15 NW2d 769 (ND 1944)
    • Skjervem v. Minot State University, 2003 ND 52, 658 NW2d 750 (discussion of notice)
  • Notes: For cases of ice and snow, see C - 16.10.